|
Introduction
A
developmental framework outlined below occupies the center for much
of my work and many of my writings. The concept of
personhood and a model of life-long human
development can be applied to understand the nature
of suffering,
as well as to comprehend experiences of
enhanced well-being occasionally reported by dying
patients.
Although symptom management is the first
priority for palliative care, it is not the ultimate
goal. True person and family-centered care strives
not only to ensure comfort, but also to improve
quality of life and preserve opportunities for
people who are dying and for their families to grow
through times of illness, caregiving and
grief.
The
specific characteristics of personal experience with
advanced illness, dying and grieving vary widely
from person to person. The conceptual framework and
the language of life-long development effectively
encompasses the broad range of human phenomenology
related to these experiences – from severe
suffering on the one hand, to a sense of profound
well-being on the other.
Building
from a foundation of human development within child
psychology, education and pediatrics, I have worked
to extend and apply life-long human development as a
theoretical basis for the studying of end-of-life
experience and shaping clinical care.
The
specific work that a person has need for, or
interest in, doing as they confront life’s end
will vary. A
person’s individuality is
not diminished by recognition of elemental commonalities within the human condition as life
ends. Issues of life completion and life closure are
available to each individual – and one need
not await serious, life-limiting illness for these
issues to have relevance.
The
end-of-life developmental landmarks and the taskwork
that subserves them are intended to represent
predictable personal challenges as well as important
opportunities of persons as they die. I have
provided the “working set” of developmental
landmarks and taskwork below as an example of how
this construct can be applied.
This "working
set" of developmental landmarks and tasks
evolved from notes that I kept in trying to make
sense of clinical challenges in a way that would
inform caring interventions. The actual landmarks
and taskwork delineated invite refinement and
modification. The general developmental approach can
provide a valuable map to clinicians through the
treacherous landscape of the dying experience and
end-of-life care.
Importantly,
within this model one need not sanitize nor glorify
the experience of life's end to think of a person as
having died well or, similarly, as having achieved a
degree of wellness in their dying. Personal
development is rarely easy. The touchstone of dying
well -- the sense of growing individually or
together in the midst of dying -- is that the
experience is of value and meaningful for the person
and their family.
|